Ai generated fan fiction?

[lupingavemebrairot]

are people okay with ai generate fanfiction....I role play alot with ai, and I get into alot of crazy shennanigans. both sfw and nsfw....its not like fanfiction in the traditional sense, more like ai role play transcripts...i wont post if people dont want me too.

 

[JeyPawlik]

I'm firmly in the no AI camp

 

[lupingavemebrairot]

I'm firmly in the no AI camp

well I mean I don't use it to write fanfiction i use it for roleplay.....like I don't feel comfortable doing role play with strangers because I've did role play back when I was a kid and had one too many weird/predatory experiences. if it werent for ai I wouldn't be able to enjoy role playing again, most of my posts on here and social media are kind of dependant on some sort of ai tech for accesibility reasons. I know ai has a very bad rap but I think some of the attitudes are a bit closed minded because with out this new tech I'd be struggling to even write a sentence let alone enjoy a once forgotten hobby.

i do want to point out, its mostly big corpo ai that profits off scaping data, almost all the models I use aside from my tts and stt services are free open sourced model and most of the models I use are basically mergers off already existing models. and currently I am training a small custom model based on public domain works, for more prosey and flowery rpg with on 10 percent be claude based synthetic data.

 

[Tsushi]

I'm gonna say no personally and probably make a rule of no AI art in general, though thank you very much for asking because I hadn't thought about it when I made the forum!

But to explain why, I don't think it can be used without being a threat to artist's future careers at this time.

I'm glad some systems are entirely opt in, because of the lack of transparency and consent in AI I can never be sure, and opt in still means we fed this all the data of public domain books/art by people who are dead and can't consent. I'm glad those models are more legally in the clear but to me they are still using the art of people who can't have say in that. It's not about legality to me, it's about morality.

And even if the consent issues weren't a thing, for example if you fed a model only your own art and art of people you expressly asked for permission, it's still against what I see as the soul and spirit of art, which is communication.

To me, even if a novel or painting is the most beautiful thing I've ever seen, it would immediately become less compelling to me upon knowing it was made by AI. AI has no creative process, nothing to communicate. Writing for me is therapeutic and when people read it and share with me that it made them feel things, that's such a meaningful moment for both sides. I think AI threatens that relationship.

Obviously what you do on your own time for fun isn't something I'm going to police at all. I'm glad it's fun for you and I'm happy you're working on something you enjoy!

I'm just gonna say no AI generated art on here going into the future. Maybe something about the technology will change, and I'll reconsider. I do think some AI tools such as translation or closed captions are good for humans overall, so this isn't really about banning ALL AI, this is about things where a robot is making the primary creative choices. Hopefully that makes sense